**The big picture:** A federal judge dismissed a discrimination and retaliation lawsuit against Purdue University, filed by its former Chief Diversity Officer, citing insufficient evidence. The ruling was made on September 17, 2026, in favor of the university. **Why it matters:** This outcome highlights the significant evidentiary burden plaintiffs face in employment discrimination cases and underscores the legal complexities employers navigate in D&I-related disputes. It reinforces the need for robust internal processes and documentation. **Between the lines:** - A federal judge ruled that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence. - The lawsuit involved claims of discrimination and retaliation. - The plaintiff was Purdue University's former Chief Diversity Officer. **Staffing & HR impact:** HR and talent acquisition leaders must ensure meticulous documentation and clear policies, especially concerning D&I roles, to mitigate legal risks. This case emphasizes the critical role of strong HR compliance frameworks in defending against employment litigation. **The bottom line:** The high bar for proving discrimination and retaliation claims remains a key factor in employment law.